New Hampshire
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
12  Elinor Purrier JR 19:26
587  Sarah Keiran SR 21:04
630  Margaret Champagne FR 21:07
707  Melissa Menghini FR 21:13
728  Hannah Kimball SR 21:14
986  Amanda Symanski JR 21:31
1,191  Alexandria Giese SR 21:44
1,265  Riley Gilmore SO 21:48
1,286  Shannon Murdock SO 21:50
1,434  Julia Shorter JR 21:58
1,739  Cassandra Kruse SR 22:17
National Rank #77 of 344
Northeast Region Rank #10 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.4%
Top 10 in Regional 62.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Elinor Purrier Sarah Keiran Margaret Champagne Melissa Menghini Hannah Kimball Amanda Symanski Alexandria Giese Riley Gilmore Shannon Murdock Julia Shorter Cassandra Kruse
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/16 933 19:40 20:57 20:58 21:16 21:27 21:41 21:52 21:57 22:23
Maine and New Hampshire Dual Meet 09/23 1252 21:47 22:30 21:56 22:17
NEICAAA Championship 10/08 1110 20:55 21:03 20:57 21:14 21:38 22:26
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Blue) 10/15 892 19:22 20:55 21:11 20:57 21:18 21:59
America East Championship 10/29 920 19:33 21:29 20:50 21:17 21:03 21:39 21:55 21:30 21:51 22:20
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 944 19:26 21:06 21:52 22:00 21:03 21:24 21:42





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 27.0 654 0.1
Region Championship 100% 9.8 292 0.1 0.6 1.8 4.4 7.9 13.7 16.6 17.2 15.3 12.0 7.9 2.1 0.7 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elinor Purrier 100% 15.3 1.3 2.1 3.5 4.1 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.9 3.4 2.6 2.6 2.9 2.4 2.2 1.9 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.9
Sarah Keiran 0.0% 214.5
Margaret Champagne 0.0% 172.5
Melissa Menghini 0.0% 206.5
Hannah Kimball 0.0% 194.5
Amanda Symanski 0.0% 220.5
Alexandria Giese 0.0% 225.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elinor Purrier 1.0 59.3 20.7 8.7 4.5 3.1 1.4 1.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Sarah Keiran 64.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2
Margaret Champagne 68.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3
Melissa Menghini 76.7 0.1 0.2
Hannah Kimball 79.1
Amanda Symanski 103.9
Alexandria Giese 124.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 3
4 0.6% 0.6 4
5 1.8% 1.8 5
6 4.4% 4.4 6
7 7.9% 7.9 7
8 13.7% 13.7 8
9 16.6% 16.6 9
10 17.2% 17.2 10
11 15.3% 15.3 11
12 12.0% 12.0 12
13 7.9% 7.9 13
14 2.1% 2.1 14
15 0.7% 0.7 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.1% 0.1 100.0 0.0 0.1




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Elon 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0